|
|
|||||||
| ZAR ZAR-related questions. Digital image recovery; General data recovery (filesystems and RAIDs). |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello,
My raid 5 array seemed to be crashed this morning, so after some recommendations i tried out ZAR, First of all awsome application! But, I had a Raid 5 Configuration with 5x 500gb drive, 2 of those where hot spare, if i recall right. I've put disk 1,2,3 in an other machine can't put more in as the pc doesnt profides me more disks in it. But as 4,5 where hot spare i guessed it should be ok. So i started scanning with ZAR, and i was amaged by the result, directory tree was there, not complete but atleast someth. I am recovering it now, but the data seems to be corrupt, PDF files are half, like they got cut off in the middle, and Word/Excel files are giving error messages about corruption. Also, there seems to folders to be missing, well not some. quite alot... Should i get a pc where i can attach all 5 disks in? should i change settings in ZAR? Im running out of options, and really getting nervous about the dataloss...because ofcourse there is no recent back up! |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
First of all make sure you are running the latest version
http://www.z-a-recovery.com/zar-83-053.exe Now, you have 5x 500GB drives. You say two drives were hot spare, but that would not be a typical configuration. See: Two drives as hot spares leaves us with three drives in the array. The usable size of the array is thus 1 TB (1000 GB). One hot spare drive would give four drives in the array and 1.5TB usable capacity. Now this becomes a problem if you can only put three drives in, and I reckon you cannot determine which of five was hotspare. I suggest you find a way to connect at least four drives. With any four (of five) drives connected, it should be possible to rebuild the array without knowing which of the drives was a hot spare (blank).
__________________
Best regards, Alexey |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hello there,
I've managed to get a system where i could connect all 5 drives to, without a raid controller.. Also i changed settings to a full scan instead of quick...its scanning for bout 12hours now, and at 90% taking ages..hopefully with some more results now. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Right, done with the scan,
Results where depressing, instead of some data there is nothing. He can't find volumes, and if i just press the unknown he finds some. But all in /Lostfiles and /Fragmented. I changed all settings back to default, and give it another try here some lines from the log: Quote:
The whole log is covered with Alerts like that is that normal? or what should i do? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
What size the full log file is? Is it possible that you ZIP it and email to me at development@z-a-recovery.com (the mailbox accepts about 10 MB max)?
Massive amount of alerts in earlier stages is not really a problem, but I need the full log file, not just excerpts.
__________________
Best regards, Alexey |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zero Microsoft Outlook PST after MFT Master File Table Index Failure on a RAID system | Illuminator | ZAR | 0 | 14th March 2009 00:36 |
| Failure to Recover | dglaman | ZAR | 3 | 25th November 2008 08:31 |
| Raid 5 unallocated disk after failure | britac | ZAR | 5 | 31st January 2008 12:05 |